丁香实验_LOGO
登录
提问
我要登录
|免费注册

审稿意见要求 statistical plan ?

相关实验:基于 SPSS 的卡方检验

user-title

此用户已注销

一偏临床类的文章,二审意见回来就一个意见如下:

Can the authors submit a detailed statistical plan prepared by their institutional statistician if available? Alternatively an independent statisticians input will be acceptable. The stats are not robust enough to make the claims being made.....

求教各位大神,该如何回复呢?感激不尽!

wx-share
分享

2 个回答

user-title

土井挞克树

有帮助

需要你提供一个统计分析方案,也就是说明你为什么用这种统计方法。

user-title

loveliufudan

有帮助

这是一个关于文章统计证明强度不够的回馈。你可以这样回复:

"Thank you for your feedback. We appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns. To improve the robustness of our statistical analysis, we will obtain the input of our institutional statistician or an independent statistician. We will submit a detailed statistical plan to ensure the validity and reliability of our results. Thank you for your valuable input."


这样回复既表达了感谢,同时也表明了你愿意采取措施来提高文章的统计学证明水平。

提问
扫一扫
丁香实验小程序二维码
实验小助手
丁香实验公众号二维码
扫码领资料
反馈
TOP
打开小程序