Theoretical Aspects of the Quantitative Characterization of Ligand Binding
互联网
1601
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
Living organisms grow, differentiate, reproduce, and respond to their environment via specific and integrated interactions between biomolecules. The investigation of molecular interactions therefore constitutes a major area of biochemical study, occupying a ubiquitous and central position between molecular physiology on the one hand and structural chemistry on the other. While specificity resides in the details of structural recognition, the dynamic interplay between biomolecules is orchestrated precisely by the thermodynamics of the biomolecular equilibria involved. A common set of physicochemical principles applies to all such phenomena, irrespective of whether the interaction of interest involves an enzyme and its substrate or inhibitor, a hormone or growth factor and its receptor, an antibody and its antigen, or, indeed, the binding of effector molecules that modulate these interactions. The binding affinity, binding specificity, number of binding sites per molecule, as well as the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding energy are common parameters that assist an understanding of the biochemical outcome. This unit aims to provide an overview of the design and interpretation of binding experiments.
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryTable of Contents
- Rectangular Hyperbolic Binding Responses
- Quantitative Characterization of a Hyperbolic Response
- Illustrative Analysis of Experimental Results
- Binding Responses Deviating from Rectangular Hyperbolic Form
- Complications Arising from Nonspecific Binding
- Concluding Remarks
- Literature Cited
- Figures
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryMaterials
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryFigures
-
Figure a0.5A.1 Illustrative dependences of the binding function ( r ) upon free ligand concentration ( C S ) for various types of acceptor‐ligand interaction. Rectangular hyperbolic dependence (—) for an acceptor with two equivalent and independent sites ( K AS = K 1 = K 2 = K 3 = K 4 = 105 M−1 ). Binding curve (‐ ‐ ‐) for an acceptor with two independent but nonequivalent sites ( K 1 = K 4 = 106 M−1 ; K 2 = K 3 = 104 M−1 ). Sigmoidal binding curve (‐ ‐ ‐) for an acceptor with two equivalent but dependent sites ( K 1 = K 2 = 104 M−1 ; K 3 = K 4 = 106 M−1 ). See Equations ‐ for equilibrium constant nomenclature. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.2 Illustrative characterization of an acceptor‐ligand interaction for a system with limited ligand solubility. (A ) Estimation of the number of binding sites by titration of 3 µM acceptor with ligand under stoichiometric conditions: p = 2 on the grounds that 6 µM ligand is required to titrate 3 µM acceptor. (B ) Binding data obtained (for example) by equilibrium dialysis over the limited range of ligand solubility (<10 µM), together with the best‐fit rectangular hyperbolic relationship (Equation ) for a system with p = 2 (see A). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.3 Use of various linear transforms (Equations ‐ ) of the rectangular hyperbolic binding equation to characterize an acceptor‐ligand interaction with p = 2 and K AS = 105 M−1 . (A ) Scatchard plot; (B ) Hames plot; (C ) double‐reciprocal plot. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.4 Schematic representation of the strategy for the quantitative characterization of a binding response. Taken from Winzor and Sawyer (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.5 Results obtained by equilibrium dialysis (filled circles) and sedimentation velocity (open circles) for the interaction of methyl orange (S) with bovine serum albumin (A). (A ) Semilogarithmic representation of the results, together with the double‐reciprocal transform of the equilibrium dialysis data (inset). (B ) Untransformed dependence of the binding function upon free ligand concentration, together with the best‐fit description by nonlinear regression analysis according to Equation . Equilibrium dialysis data are taken from Klotz et al. (), and sedimentation velocity data from Steinberg and Schachman (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.6 Characterization of the interaction between NADH and rabbit muscle lactate dehydrogenase (pH 7.4; ionic strength, I , 0.15) by nonlinear regression analysis of the untransformed gel chromatographic binding data in terms of Equation : the upper pattern shows random scatter in the residuals plot. The inset displays the same data in semilogarithmic format. Data taken in part from Ward and Winzor (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.7 Evaluation of the stoichiometry of an acceptor‐ligand interaction by stoichiometric titration. Curves have been constructed on the basis of a single acceptor site with a binding constant ( K AS ) of 106 M−1 and total acceptor concentrations ( C A ) of 10−4 M (curve a), 10−5 M (curve b), and 10−6 M (curve c). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.8 Fluorescence polarization (anisotropy) study of the interaction between E. coli cAMP receptor protein and a 32‐bp DNA fragment of the lac promoter. (A ) Stoichiometric titration of the fluorescently labeled DNA fragment with receptor protein in the presence of 0.2 mM cAMP. (B ) Equilibrium titration in the presence of 0.5 µM cAMP. (C ) Secondary plot of the equilibrium titration data as a binding curve, together with the best fit description ( p = 1, K AS = 6.0 × 107 M−1 ). Data taken from Heyduk and Lee (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.9 Schematic representation of the competitive interactions of soluble ligand (S) and immobilized affinity sites (X) for acceptor (A) in quantitative affinity chromatography. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.10 Studies of the interaction between acceptor and immobilized affinity sites by the recycling partition variant of quantitative affinity chromatography. (A ) Schematic representation of the experimental system. (B ) Scatchard plot of results obtained for the interaction of antithrombin with heparin‐Sepharose (Hogg et al., ). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.11 Characterization of an acceptor‐ligand interaction by competitive binding assay. (A ) Scatchard plot of equilibrium responses for the interaction of the soluble domain of interleukin 6 receptor (A) with interleukin 6 immobilized on the sensor surface of a BIAcore instrument. (B ) Plot of results obtained with interleukin 6 as the competing ligand (S) in accordance with Equation , with q = 2. Data taken from Ward et al. (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.12 Illustrative Scatchard plots for the interaction of ligand with two independent but nonequivalent acceptor sites. The higher‐affinity site has been ascribed a binding constant of 105 M−1 , whereas the other has been accorded values of 5 × 104 M−1 (curve a), 104 M−1 (curve b), and 103 M−1 (curve c). The broken line describes the interaction of ligand with the higher‐affinity binding site, whereas the dotted lines have a common abscissa intercept of 2 and slopes characteristic of the weaker interactions. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.13 Analysis of binding data for the interaction of aldolase with rabbit muscle myofibrils. (A ) Conventional Scatchard plot. (B ) Multivalent Scatchard plot according to Equation with f = 4. Data taken from Table 1 of Kuter et al. (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.14 Schematic representation of binding curves and their Scatchard transforms reflecting (A ) positive cooperativity and (B ) negative cooperativity of acceptor sites for a univalent ligand. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.15 Conflicting criteria for cooperative binding of multivalent ligands. (A ) Schematic binding curve and its multivalent Scatchard counterpart reflecting either positive cooperativity of acceptor sites or negative cooperativity of ligand sites. (B ) Corresponding plots reflecting either negative cooperativity of acceptor sites or positive cooperativity of ligand sites. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.16 Allosteric activation and inhibition of E. coli aspartate transcarbamylase by effectors. Open circles, dependence of initial velocity v (expressed relative to maximal value v m ) upon aspartate concentration ( C S ) in the presence of saturating carbamyl phosphate; filled circles and filled squares, corresponding dependences with 0.5 mM CTP and 2 mM ATP, respectively, included in the reaction mixtures. Data taken from Gerhart (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.17 Concentration dependence of the binding curve for a self‐associating acceptor. Binding curves for oxygen uptake by the indicated total concentrations of human hemoglobin (0.7 to 106 µg/ml) at pH 7.4. Data taken from Mills et al. (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.18 Perturbation of the monomer‐dimer equilibrium for α‐chymotrypsin (pH 3.9, I 0.11) by the preferential interaction of indole with monomeric enzyme. Plot of results from sedimentation equilibrium experiments according to Equation A.5A.48 for enzyme alone (open symbols) and in the presence of 1 mM (filled circles) and 2 mM (filled squares) ligand. View Image -
Figure a0.5A.19 Nonspecific ligand interactions in studies involving membrane receptors. (A ) Binding of [125 I]insulin to insulin receptors on Chinese hampster ovary cells (filled squares), and the corrected binding curve (open squares) after allowance for bound radioactivity in the presence of excess nonlabeled insulin (filled circles). Adapted from Winzor and Sawyer (). (B ) Uptake of metoprolol as the result of physical partition into hepatic microsomes. Data taken from Bogoyevitch et al. (). View Image -
Figure a0.5A.20 Effects of nonspecificity in the binding of ligands to a sequence of residues on a linear polymer chain. (A ) Scatchard plot of experimental results (Latt and Sober, ) for the interaction of an ε‐dinitrophenyl‐labeled hexameric lysine oligopeptide with poly(I + C). (B ) Schematic representation of thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of nonspecific interaction between a ligand and three‐residue sequences on a twelve‐residue linear polymer. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
| Literature Cited | |
| Adair, G.S. 1925. The hemoglobin system. VI. The oxygen dissociation curve of hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem. 63:529‐545. | |
| Anderson, S.R. and Weber, G. 1965. Multiplicity of binding by lactate dehydrogenases. Biochemistry 4:1948‐1957. | |
| Baghurst, P.A. and Nichol, L.W. 1975. Binding of organic phosphates to human methemoglobin A: Perturbation of the polymerization of proteins by effectors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 412:168‐180. | |
| Bergman, D.A. and Winzor, D.J. 1986. Quantitative affinity chromatography: Increased versatility of the technique for studies of ligand binding. Anal. Biochem. 153:380‐386. | |
| Bergman, D.A. and Winzor, D.J. 1989. Space‐filling effects of inert solutes as probes for the detection and study of substrate‐mediated conformational changes by enzyme kinetics: Theoretical considerations. J. Theor. Biol. 137:171‐191. | |
| Bergman, D.A., Shearwin, K.E., and Winzor, D.J. 1989. Effects of thermodynamic nonideality on the kinetics of ester hydrolysis by α‐chymotrypsin: A model system with preexistence of the isomerization equilibrium. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274:55‐63. | |
| Blatt, W.F., Robinson, S.M., and Bixler, H.J. 1968. Membrane ultrafiltration: Diafiltration technique and its application to microsolute exchange and binding phenomena. Anal. Biochem. 26:151‐173. | |
| Bogoyevitch, M.A., Gillam, E.M.J., Reilly, P.E.B., and Winzor, D.J. 1987. Physical partitioning as the major source of metoprolol uptake by hepatic microsomes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 36:4167‐4168. | |
| Brinkworth, R.I., Masters, C.J., and Winzor, D.J. 1975. Evaluation of equilibrium constants for the interaction of lactate dehydrogenase with reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. Biochem. J. 151:631‐636. | |
| Calvert, P.D., Nichol, L.W., and Sawyer, W.H. 1979. Binding equations for interacting systems comprising multivalent acceptor and bivalent ligand: Application to antigen‐antibody systems. J. Theor. Biol. 80:233‐247. | |
| Cann, J.R., Nichol, L.W., and Winzor, D.J. 1981. Micellization of chlorpromazine: Implications in the binding of the drug to brain tubulin. Mol. Pharmacol. 20:244‐246. | |
| Changeux, J.P. and Rubin, M.M. 1968. Allosteric interactions in aspartate transcarbamylase. III. Interpretation of experimental data in terms of the model of Monod, Wyman and Changeux. Biochemistry 7:553‐561. | |
| Chatelier, R.C. and Sawyer, W.H. 1987. Isoparametric analysis of binding and partitioning processes. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 15:49‐61. | |
| Colowick, S.P. and Womack, F.C. 1969. Binding of diffusible molecules: Measurement by rate of dialysis. J. Biol. Chem. 244:774‐776. | |
| Dunn, B.M. and Chaiken, I.M. 1974. Quantitative affinity chromatography: Determination of binding constants by elution with competitive inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:2382‐2385. | |
| Edwards, P.R., Maule, C.H., Leatherbarrow, R.J., and Winzor, D.J. 1998. Second‐order kinetic analysis of IAsys biosensor data: Its use and applicability. Anal. Biochem. 263:1‐12. | |
| Epstein, I.R. 1978. Cooperative and noncooperative binding of large ligands to a finite one‐dimensional lattice: A model for ligand‐oligonucleotide interactions. Biophys. Chem. 8:327‐339. | |
| Epstein, I.R. 1979. Kinetics of nucleic acid–large ligand interactions: Exact Monte carlo treatment and limited cases of reversible binding. Biopolymers 18:2037‐2050. | |
| Ford, C.L. and Winzor, D.J. 1981. A recycling gel partition technique for the study of protein‐ligand interactions: The binding of methyl orange to bovine serum albumin. Anal. Biochem. 114:146‐152. | |
| Ford, C.L. and Winzor, D.J. 1983. Experimental tests of charge conservation in macromolecular interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 756:49‐55. | |
| Ford, C.L., Winzor, D.J., Nichol, L.W., and Sculley, M.J. 1984. Effects of thermodynamic nonideality in ligand binding studies. Biophys. Chem. 18:1‐9. | |
| Frieden, C. 1967. Treatment of enzyme kinetic data. II. The multisite case: Comparison of allosteric models and a possible new mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 242:4045‐4052. | |
| Gerhart, J.C. 1970. A discussion of the regulatory properties of aspartate transcarbamylase from Escherichia coli. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 2:275‐325. | |
| Goodman, D.S. 1958. Interaction of human serum albumin with long‐chain fatty acid anions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80:3892‐3898. | |
| Haigh, E.A. and Sawyer, W.H. 1978. Interpretation of double reciprocal plots to determine the spectroscopic parameters of bound ligand for binding assays. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 31:1‐5. | |
| Hall, D.R. and Winzor, D.J. 1997. Use of a resonant mirror biosensor to characterize the interaction of carboxypeptidase A with an elicited monoclonal antibody. Anal. Biochem. 244:152‐160. | |
| Hall, D.R. and Winzor, D.J. 1998. Potential of biosensor technology for the characterization of interactions by quantitative affinity chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B 715:163‐181. | |
| Harris, S.J. and Winzor, D.J. 1988. Thermodynamic nonideality as a probe of allosteric mechanisms: Preexistence of the isomerization equilibrium for rabbit muscle pyruvate kinase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 265:458‐465. | |
| Harris, S.J., Jackson, C.M., and Winzor, D.J. 1995a. The rectangular hyperbolic binding equation for multivalent ligands. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 316:20‐23. | |
| Harris, S.J., Jackson, C.M., and Winzor, D.J. 1995b. Effects of heterogeneity and cooperativity on the forms of binding curves for multivalent ligands. J. Protein Chem. 14:399‐407. | |
| Heyduk, T. and Lee, J.C. 1990. Application of fluorescence energy transfer and polarization to monitor Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and lac promoter interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87:1744‐1748. | |
| Hinman, N.D. and Cann, J.R. 1976. Reversible binding of chlorpromazine to brain tubulin. Mol. Pharmacol. 12:769‐777. | |
| Hogg, P.J. and Winzor, D.J. 1984. Quantitative affinity chromatography: Further developments in the analysis of experimental results from column chromatography and partition equilibrium studies. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 234:55‐60. | |
| Hogg, P.J. and Winzor, D.J. 1985. Effects of ligand multivalency in binding studies: A general counterpart of the Scatchard analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 843:159‐163. | |
| Hogg, P.J., Jackson, C.M., and Winzor, D.J. 1991. Use of quantitative affinity chromatography for characterizing high‐affinity interactions: Binding of heparin to antithrombin III. Anal. Biochem. 192:303‐311. | |
| Holbrook, J.J. 1972. Protein fluorescence of lactate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 128:921‐931. | |
| Holbrook, F.J., Yates, D.W., Reynolds, S.J., Evans, R.W., Greenwood, C., and Gore, M.G. 1972. Protein fluorescence of nicotinamide‐dependent dehydrogenases. Biochem. J. 128:933‐940. | |
| Jacobsen, M.P. and Winzor, D.J. 1995. Characterization of the interactions of NADH with the dimeric and tetrameric states of methemoglobin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1246:17‐23. | |
| Kalinin, N.L., Ward, L.D., and Winzor, D.J. 1995. Effects of solute valence on the evaluation of binding constants by biosensor technology: Studies with concanavalin A and interleukin‐6 as partitioning proteins. Anal. Biochem. 228:238‐244. | |
| Klotz, I.M. 1946. The application of the law of mass action to binding by proteins: Interactions with calcium. Arch. Biochem. 9:109‐117. | |
| Klotz, I.M. 1983. Ligand‐receptor interactions: What we can and cannot learn from binding measurements. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 4:253‐255. | |
| Klotz, I.M. 1997. Ligand‐ Receptor Energetics: A Guide for the Perplexed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. | |
| Klotz, I.M., Walker, F.M., and Pivan, R.B. 1946. The binding of organic ions by proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68:1486‐1490. | |
| Koshland, D.E., Némethy, G., and Filmer, D. 1966. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 5:365‐385. | |
| Kowalczykowski, S.C., Paul, L.S., Lonberg, N., Newport, J.W., McSwiggen, J.A., and von Hippel, P.H. 1986. Cooperative and noncooperative binding of protein ligands to nucleic acid lattices: Experimental approaches to the determination of thermodynamic parameters. Biochemistry 25:1226‐1240. | |
| Kuter, M.R., Masters, C.J., and Winzor, D.J. 1983. Equilibrium partition studies of the interaction between aldolase and myofibrils. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 225:384‐389. | |
| Latt, S.A. and Sober, H.A. 1967. Protein‐oligonucleotide interactions. II. Oligopeptide‐polyribonucleotide binding studies. Biochemistry 6:3293‐3306. | |
| McGhee, J.D. and von Hippel, P.H. 1974. Theoretical aspects of DNA‐protein interactions: Cooperative and noncooperative binding of large ligands to a one‐dimensional homogeneous lattice. J. Mol. Biol. 86:469‐489. | |
| Mills, F.C., Johnson, M.L., and Ackers, G.K. 1976. Oxygenation‐linked subunit interactions in human hemoglobin: Experimental studies on the concentration dependence of oxygenation curves. Biochemistry 15:5350‐5362. | |
| Milthorpe, B.K., Jeffrey, P.D., and Nichol, L.W. 1975. Direct analysis of sedimentation equilibrium results obtained with polymerizing systems. Biophys. Chem. 3:169‐176. | |
| Monod, J., Wyman, J., and Changeux, J.‐P. 1965. On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:88‐118. | |
| Munro, P.D., Jackson, C.M., and Winzor, D.J. 1998. On the need to consider kinetic as well as thermodynamic consequences of the parking problem in quantitative studies of nonspecific binding between proteins and linear polymer chains. Biophys. Chem. 71:185‐198. | |
| Nichol, L.W. and Winzor, D.J. 1964. The determination of equilibrium constants from transport data on rapidly reacting systems of the type A + B ↔C. J. Phys. Chem. 68:2455‐2463. | |
| Nichol, L.W., Jackson, W.J.H., and Winzor, D.J. 1967. A theoretical study of the binding of small molecules to a polymerizing protein system: A model for allosteric effects. Biochemistry 6:2449‐2456. | |
| Nichol, L.W., Smith, G.D., and Ogston, A.G. 1969. Effects of isomerization and polymerization on the binding of ligands to acceptor molecules: Implications in metabolic control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 184:1‐10. | |
| Nichol, L.W., Jackson, W.J.H., and Winzor, D.J. 1972a. Preferential binding of competitive inhibitors to the monomeric form of α‐chymotrypsin. Biochemistry 11:585‐591. | |
| Nichol, L.W., O'Dea, K., and Baghurst, P.A. 1972b. Binding of dissimilar ligand molecules to an interacting acceptor: A model for the action of effectors. J. Theor. Biol. 34:255‐263. | |
| Nichol, L.W., Ogston, A.G., Winzor, D.J., and Sawyer, W.H. 1974. Evaluation of equilibrium constants by affinity chromatography. Biochem. J. 143:435‐443. | |
| Nichol, L.W., Ward, L.D., and Winzor, D.J. 1981. Multivalency of the partitioning species in quantitative affinity chromatography: Evaluation of the site‐binding constant for the aldolase‐phosphate interaction from studies with cellulose phosphate as the affinity matrix. Biochemistry 20:4856‐4860. | |
| Olson, S.T., Halvorson, H.R., and Björk, I. 1991. Quantitative characterization of the thrombin‐heparin interaction: Discrimination between specific and nonspecific binding models. J. Biol. Chem. 266:6342‐6352. | |
| Saroff, H. 1991. Ligand‐dependent aggregation and cooperativity: A critique. Biochemistry 30:10085‐10090. | |
| Scatchard, G. 1949. The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 51:660‐672. | |
| Shanley, B.C., Clarke, K., and Winzor, D.J. 1985. Evaluation of the stoichiometry and strength of chloroquine‐porphyrin interactions by difference spectroscopy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 34:141‐142. | |
| Sophianopoulos, J.A., Durham, S.J., Sophianopoulos, A.J., Ragsdale, H.L., and Cropper, W.P. 1978. Ultrafiltration is theoretically equivalent to equilibrium dialysis but much simpler to carry out. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 187:132‐137. | |
| Steinberg, I.Z. and Schachman, H.K. 1966. Ultracentrifugation with absorption optics. V. Analysis of interacting systems involving macromolecules and small molecules. Biochemistry 5:3728‐3747. | |
| Tellam, R., Winzor, D.J., and Nichol, L.W. 1978. The role of zinc in the stabilization of the dimeric form of α‐amylase. Biochem. J. 173:185‐190. | |
| Tellam, R., de Jersey, J., and Winzor, D.J. 1979. Evaluation of equilibrium constants for the binding of N‐acetyl‐L‐tryptophan to the monomeric and dimeric forms of α‐chymotrypsin. Biochemistry 18:5316‐5321. | |
| Thompson, C.J. and Klotz, I.M. 1971. Macromolecule‐small molecule interactions: Analytical and graphical reexamination. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 147:178‐185. | |
| Ward, L.D. and Winzor, D.J. 1983. Thermodynamic studies of the activation of rabbit muscle lactate dehydrogenase by phosphate. Biochem. J. 215:685‐691. | |
| Ward, L.D., Howlett, G.J., Hammacher, A., Weinstock, J., Yasukawa, K., Simpson, R.J., and Winzor, D.J. 1995. Use of a biosensor with surface plasmon resonance detection for the determination of binding constants: Measurement of interleukin‐6 binding to the soluble interleukin‐6 receptor. Biochemistry 34:2901‐2907. | |
| Wills, P.R., Jacobsen, M.P., and Winzor, D.J. 1996. Direct analysis of solute self‐association by sedimentation equilibrium. Biopolymers 38:119‐130. | |
| Winzor, D.J. 1997. Quantitative affinity chromatography. In Affinity Separations: A Practical Approach (P. Matejtschuk, ed.) pp. 39‐60. IRL Press, Oxford. | |
| Winzor, D.J. and Jackson, C.M. 1993. Determination of binding constants by quantitative affinity chromatography: Current and future applications. In Handbook of Affinity Chromatography (T. Kline, ed.) pp. 253‐298. Marcel Dekker, New York. | |
| Winzor, D.J. and Sawyer, W.H. 1995. Quantitative Characterization of Ligand Binding. John Wiley & Sons, New York. |
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
