Genetically Engineered Mice by Pronuclear DNA Microinjection
互联网
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
The generation of transgenic mice by DNA microinjection is a powerful tool to investigate the molecular regulation of gene expression, development, and disease. The power of this technology is that foreign DNA can be introduced into every cell of a developing organism, and the phenotypic impact of this genetic modification can be investigated in a system under the constraints of normal development and physiology. The generation of transgenic mice requires the preparation of the transgene DNA construction, collection of one?cell fertilized mouse embryos, injection of the transgene into mouse embryos, and transfer of the surviving embryos into a pseudopregnant female. Mice born from such manipulations are then screened for the presence of the transgene. The execution of these procedures requires a highly efficient system; otherwise, the cost of the generation of these mice can be cost prohibitive. However, the production of these animals can provide an invaluable research resource. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 2:245?262 © 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: transgenic; mouse; DNA microinjection
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of Transgene DNA
- Basic Protocol 2: Embryo Collection
- Basic Protocol 3: Microinjection
- Basic Protocol 4: Embryo Transfer
- Support Protocol 1: Embryo Culture
- Basic Protocol 5: Identification of Transgenic Mice
- Reagents and Solutions
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
Materials
Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of Transgene DNA
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Embryo Collection
Materials
Basic Protocol 3: Microinjection
Materials
Basic Protocol 4: Embryo Transfer
Materials
Support Protocol 1: Embryo Culture
Materials
Basic Protocol 5: Identification of Transgenic Mice
Materials
|
Figures
-
Figure 1. Overall scheme for the generation of genetically engineered mice. View Image -
Figure 2. Embryo collection. (A ) Ampulla of the mouse oviduct being gently torn to release embryos. (B ) Embryos being released from ampulla. (C ) Fertile one‐cell embryos. (D ) Unfertilized ova and fragmented cells. View Image -
Figure 3. Inverted microscope with Hoffman objective lenses and micromanipulators. Holding and injection needles are in place and lowered into injection dish containing embryos. View Image -
Figure 4. Enlarging opening of injection needle by brushing needle against the polished holding needle. View Image -
Figure 5. DNA microinjection into the male pronucleus of the one‐cell mouse embryo. View Image -
Figure 6. DNA microinjection into the male pronucleus of the one‐cell mouse embryo. (A ) Injection needle moving into the male pronucleus of the one‐cell embryo. (B ) Expansion of the male pronucleus upon delivery of DNA under hydrostatic pressure. The black arrows show that the pronucleus diameter increases in size by approximately 50%. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
Literature Cited | |
Auerbach, A.B., Norinsky, R., Ho, W., Losos, K., Guo, Q., Chatterjee, S., and Joyner, A.L. 2003. Strain‐dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production. Transgenic Res. 12:59‐69. | |
Brinster, R.L. 1968. In vitro culture of mammalian embryos. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1‐14. | |
Brinster, R.L. and Palmiter, R.D. 1984. Introduction of genes into the germ line of animals. Harvey Lect. 80:1‐38. | |
Brinster, R.L., Chen, H.Y., Trumbauer, M.E., and Avarbock, M.R. 1980. Translation of globin messenger RNA by the mouse ovum. Nature 283:499‐501. | |
Brinster, R.L., Chen, H.Y., Trumbauer, M.E., Yagle, M.K., and Palmiter, R.D. 1985. Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:4438‐4442. | |
Brown, T. 1999. Southern blotting. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 21:2.9.1‐2.9.15. | |
Capecchi, M.R. 1989. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244:1288‐1292. | |
Chatot, C.L., Lewis, J.L., Torres, I., and Ziomek, C.A. 1990. Development of 1‐cell embryos from different strains of mice in CZB medium. Biol. Reprod. 42:432‐440. | |
Clark, A.J., Harold, G., and Yull, F.E. 1997. Mammalian cDNA and prokaryotic reporter sequences silence adjacent transgenes in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1009‐1014. | |
Erbach, G.T., Lawitts, J.A., Papaioannou, V.E., and Biggers, J.D. 1994. Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media. Biol. Reprod. 50:1027‐1033. | |
Everett, J.W. 1969. Neuroendocrine aspects of mammalian reproduction. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 31:383‐416. | |
Finney, M. 2000. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 51:2.5B.1‐2.5B.9. | |
Gong, S., Zheng, C., Doughty, M.L., Losos, K., Didkovsky, N., Schambra, U.B., Nowak, N.J., Joyner, A., Leblanc, G., Hatten, M.E., and Heintz, N. 2003. A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature 425:917‐925. | |
Gordon, J.W. and Ruddle, F.H. 1981. Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science 214:1244‐1246. | |
Han, S.J., O'Malley, B.W., and DeMayo, F.J. 2009. An estrogen receptor alpha activity indicator model in mice. Genesis 47:815‐824. | |
Heintz, N. 2000. Analysis of mammalian central nervous system gene expression and function using bacterial artificial chromosome‐mediated transgenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9:937‐943. | |
Kramer, M.F., and Coen, D.M. 2001. Enzymatic amplification of DNA by PCR: Standard procedures and optimization. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 56:15.1.1‐15.1.14. | |
Lewandoski, M. 2001. Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:743‐755. | |
Nagy, A., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K., and Behringer, R. 2003. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. | |
Psychoyos, A. 1966. Study of the relations of the ovum and ondometrium during delay of nidation or the first phases of the nidation process in the female rat. C. R. Acad. Sci. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. D 263:1755‐1758. | |
Quinn, P., Barros, C., and Whittingham, D.G. 1982. Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 66:161‐168. | |
Southern, E.M. 1975. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503‐517. | |
Vunder, P.A. 1970. Hormonal regulation of the process of ovum implantation. Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 70:106‐119. | |
Whittingham, D.G. 1971. Culture of mouse ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 14:7‐21. | |
Yoshinaga, K. 1988. Uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 541:424‐431. | |
Zhao, S. 2001. A comprehensive BAC resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:141‐143. |