DamIP: Using Mutant DNA Adenine Methyltransferase to Study DNA‐Protein Interactions In Vivo
互联网
1749
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
DamIP is a new method for studying DNA?protein interaction in vivo. A mutant form of DNA adenine methyltransferase (DamK9A) from E. coli is fused to the protein of interest and expressed. The fusion protein will bind to target binding sites and introduce N 6 ?adenine methylation in nearby sites in the genomic DNA. Methylated DNA fragments are enriched by immunopreciptation with an antibody that recognizes N 6 ?methyladenine, and can then be used for further analysis, e.g., real?time PCR, microarray, or high?throughput sequencing. This method is simple and does not require protein?DNA crosslinking or a specific antibody to the protein of interest. This unit describes the application of this method for identification of DNA binding sites in vivo. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 94:21.21.1?21.21.10. © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: DNA adenine methyltransferase; transcription factor binding sites; DamIP; immunoprecipitation; chromatin immunoprecipitation
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryTable of Contents
- Introduction
- Strategic Planning
- Basic Protocol 1: DamIP for Studying DNA‐Protein Interactions In Vivo
- Support Protocol 1: Preparation of Sonicated Methylated Genomic DNA for DamIP
- Support Protocol 2: Antibody Pretreatment for DamIP
- Reagents and Solutions
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryMaterials
Basic Protocol 1: DamIP for Studying DNA‐Protein Interactions In Vivo
Materials
Support Protocol 1: Preparation of Sonicated Methylated Genomic DNA for DamIP
Materials
Support Protocol 2: Antibody Pretreatment for DamIP
Materials
|
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryFigures
-
Figure 21.21.1 Illustration of the DamIP procedure. DamK9A or DamK9A fusion protein is expressed in cells. Genomic DNA is purified, sonicated, and denatured before being mixed with anti‐m6A antibodies. Methylated DNA recognized by the antibody is enriched and then analyzed by qPCR, microarray analysis, or next‐generation sequencing. (Figure adapted from Xiao et al., .) View Image -
Figure 21.21.2 Denaturation is important for recognition of m6A by antibodies. Unmethylated or methylated plasmids were mixed with affinity‐purified m6A antibody (AP‐m6A) and enriched fragments were quantified by real‐time PCR. Denaturation of DNA by heating greatly increased the affinity of m6A antibody for methylated DNA. View Image -
Figure 21.21.3 Representative DamIP result. Primers were designed to amplify genomic regions with (FSIP) or without (SCA7) known hER binding. DNA enriched by DamIP from MCF‐7 cells transfected with DamK9A‐hER (Dam‐ER) or Dam alone was analyzed by qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
| Literature Cited | |
| Bianchi‐Frias, D., Orian, A., Delrow, J.J., Vazquez, J., Rosales‐Nieves, A.E., and Parkhurst, S.M. 2004. Hairy transcriptional repression targets and cofactor recruitment in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2:E178. | |
| Collas, P. 2009. The state‐of‐the‐art of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Methods Mol. Biol. 567:1‐25. | |
| Filion, G.J., van Bemmel, J.G., Braunschweig, U., Talhout, W., Kind, J., Ward, L.D., Brugman, W., de Castro, I.J., Kerkhoven, R.M., Bussemaker, H.J., and van Steensel, B. 2010. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143:212‐224. | |
| Guarne, A., Zhao, Q., Ghirlando, R., and Yang, W. 2002. In sights into negative modulation of E. coli replication initiation from the structure of SeqA‐hemimethylated DNA complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:839‐843. | |
| Horton, J.R., Liebert, K., Hattman, S., Jeltsch, A., and Cheng, X. 2005. Transition from nonspecific to specific DNA interactions along the substrate‐recognition pathway of dam methyltransferase. Cell 121:349‐361. | |
| Horton, J.R., Liebert, K., Bekes, M., Jeltsch, A., and Cheng, X. 2006. Structure and substrate recognition of the Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase. J. Mol. Biol. 358:559‐570. | |
| Lopez, O.J., Quintanar, A., Padhye, N.V., and Nelson, M. 2003. Genotyping of DNA using sequence‐specific methyltransferases followed by immunochemical detection. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 24:11‐28. | |
| Moss, T. and Leblanc, B. 2009. DNA‐Protein Interactions: Principles and Protocols, vol. 543, 3rd ed. Humana Press, New York. | |
| Orian, A., van Steensel, B., Delrow, J., Bussemaker, H.J., Li, L., Sawado, T., Williams, E., Loo, L.W., Cowley, S.M., Yost, C., Pierce, S., Edgar, B.A., Parkhurst, S.M., and Eisenman, R.N. 2003. Genomic binding by the Drosophila Myc, Max, Mad/Mnt transcription factor network. Genes Dev. 17:1101‐1114. | |
| Orian, A., Abed, M., Kenyagin‐Karsenti, D., and Boico, O. 2009. DamID: A methylation‐based chromatin profiling approach. Methods Mol. Biol. 567:155‐169. | |
| Ratel, D., Ravanat, J.L., Berger, F., and Wion, D. 2006a. N6‐Methyladenine: The other methylated base of DNA. Bioessays 28:309‐315. | |
| Ratel, D., Ravanat, J.L., Charles, M.P., Platet, N., Breuillaud, L., Lunardi, J., Berger, F., and Wion, D. 2006b. Undetectable levels of N6‐methyl adenine in mouse DNA: Cloning and analysis of PRED28, a gene coding for a putative mammalian DNA adenine methyltransferase. FEBS Lett. 580:3179‐3184. | |
| Ren, B., Robert, F., Wyrick, J.J., Aparicio, O., Jennings, E.G., Simon, I., Zeitlinger, J., Schreiber, J., Hannett, N., Kanin, E., Volkert, T.L., Wilson, C.J., Bell, S.P., and Young, R.A. 2000. Genome‐wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290:2306‐2309. | |
| Robertson, G., Hirst, M., Bainbridge, M., Bilenky, M., Zhao, Y., Zeng, T., Euskirchen, G., Bernier, B., Varhol, R., Delaney, A., Thiessen, , N., Griffith, O.L., He, A., Marra, M., Snyder, M., and Jones, S. 2007. Genome‐wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods 4:651‐657. | |
| Rottman, F.M., Bokar, J.A., Narayan, P., Shamtbaugh, M.E., and Ludwiczak, R. 1994. N6‐Adenosine methylation in mRNA: Substrate specificity and enzyme complexity. Biochimie 76:1109‐1114. | |
| van Steensel, B. and Henikoff, S. 2000. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:424‐428. | |
| van Steensel, B., Delrow, J., and Henikoff, S. 2001. Chromatin profiling using targeted DNA adenine methyltransferase. Nat. Genet. 27:304‐308. | |
| Venkatasubrahmanyam, S., Hwang, W.W., Meneghini, M.D., Tong, A.H., and Madhani, H.D. 2007. Genome‐wide, as opposed to local, antisilencing is mediated redundantly by the euchromatic factors Set1 and H2A.Z. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104:16609‐16614. | |
| Weber, M., Davies, J.J., Wittig, D., Oakeley, E.J., Haase, M., Lam, W.L., and Schubeler, D. 2005. Chromosome‐wide and promoter‐specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37:853‐862. | |
| Wion, D. and Casadesus, J. 2006. N6‐Methyl‐adenine: An epigenetic signal for DNA‐protein interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:183‐192. | |
| Xiao, R., Roman‐Sanchez, R., and Moore, D.D. 2010. DamIP: A novel method to identify DNA binding sites in vivo Nucl. Recept. Signal 8:e003. |
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
