RNA Analysis by Nuclease Protection
互联网
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
Nuclease protection assays (S1 nuclease protection and RNase protection) are extremely sensitive procedures for detection and quantitation of mRNA species in complex mixtures of total cellular RNA. These assays are well suited for mapping positions of external and internal junctions in RNA, such as transcription initiation and termination sites and intron/exon boundaries, and to discriminate between closely related targets by using probes designed to span the regions where the related genes differ the most. Also, because the size of the probes used in nuclease protection assays is a variable chosen by the investigator, probes may be designed to protect fragments of different sizes. This feature permits the simultaneous analysis of several different mRNAs in the same total RNA sample. In this unit, a method is included for RNase protection of target mRNA sequences, including hybridization of the probe to the target sequence, details of the actual protection assay, and detection of reaction products. An alternative method is provided for performing the RNase protection assay on a microvolume scale, which is useful when there are many samples to be analyzed. Support protocols describe synthesis and gel purification of labeled RNA probes; preparation of RNase?free yeast RNA, which acts as an aid in the quantitative precipitation of newly synthesized probe; and quantitation of target mRNA. A method describing S1 nuclease protection of target mRNA using either RNA or DNA probes is also included. Additional support protocols provide instructions for the preparation of radiolabeled DNA probes by primer?extension of double?stranded plasmid or PCR product using Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I or Taq or Tth polymerase in a thermal cycler. Another radiolabeling method details 5' end labeling of oligodeoxynucleotides and oligoribonucleotides using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Additionally, a method is described for mapping transcription start sites using the S1 nuclease protection assay.
Table of Contents
- Basic Protocol 1: RNase Protection Assay
- Alternate Protocol 1: Small‐Volume RNase Protection Assay
- Support Protocol 1: Synthesis and Gel Purification of Full‐Length RNA Probe
- Support Protocol 2: Preparation of RNase‐Free Sheared Yeast RNA
- Support Protocol 3: Absolute Quantitation of mRNA
- Basic Protocol 2: Protection of mRNA from S1 Nuclease Digestion Using Single‐Stranded DNA or RNA Probes
- Support Protocol 4: Synthesis of DNA Probes by Primer Extension of Double‐Stranded Plasmid or PCR Product Using Klenow Fragment
- Support Protocol 5: Synthesis of DNA Probes by Primer Extension of Double‐Stranded Plasmid or PCR Product in a Thermal Cycler Using Thermostable Polymerase
- Support Protocol 6: Synthesis of DNA Probes by T4 Polynucleotide Kinase End Labeling of Oligonucleotids
- Support Protocol 7: 5′ End Mapping of mRNA Transcription Start Sites
- Reagents and Solutions
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
Materials
Basic Protocol 1: RNase Protection Assay
Materials
Alternate Protocol 1: Small‐Volume RNase Protection Assay
Support Protocol 1: Synthesis and Gel Purification of Full‐Length RNA Probe
Materials
Support Protocol 2: Preparation of RNase‐Free Sheared Yeast RNA
Materials
Support Protocol 3: Absolute Quantitation of mRNA
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Protection of mRNA from S1 Nuclease Digestion Using Single‐Stranded DNA or RNA Probes
Materials
Support Protocol 4: Synthesis of DNA Probes by Primer Extension of Double‐Stranded Plasmid or PCR Product Using Klenow Fragment
Materials
Support Protocol 5: Synthesis of DNA Probes by Primer Extension of Double‐Stranded Plasmid or PCR Product in a Thermal Cycler Using Thermostable Polymerase
Materials
|
Figures
-
Figure 5.1.1 RNase protection assay of AU‐rich target sequence using different RNases. Sea urchin total RNA (5 µg) was hybridized in replicate reactions to a probe for an AT‐rich cyclin gene. Reactions were treated with either RNase T1, RNase A, RNase A/RNase T1 mixture, or RNase I (all from E. coli ), using two‐fold different amounts of each RNase. AU‐rich regions are especially susceptible to overdigestion. Several discrete bands and a high background of diffuse bands are seen with all conditions except the reactions containing RNase T1 alone, which show most of the signal in a single protected fragment. Because RNase T1 cleaves only after G residues, there is little nonspecific cleavage at transiently separated AU‐rich strands. The size of the degraded unhybridized probe fragments in the samples treated with RNase T1 alone is slightly larger than in other lanes, but no full‐length probe remains in the experimental or control lanes where T1 alone was used. View Image -
Figure 5.1.2 Typical RNase protection assay using a probe for mouse β‐actin. A 300‐base mouse β‐actin probe was hybridized to two‐fold‐increasing amounts of mouse total‐liver RNA (from 0.625 to 10 µg; lanes 4 to 8) and analyzed by RNase protection. The intensity of the protected fragment increases with increasing sample RNA, and the size of the protected fragment (250 bases) reflects a downward size shift from the full‐length probe due to degradation of the vector‐transcribed sequences in the probe. (When probes are made from PCR templates, the full‐length probe and protected fragment may be exactly the same size.) The absence of signal in the yeast RNA control lane treated with RNase (lane 3) shows that the amount of RNase used was sufficient to completely degrade all unhybridized probe. The mock‐digested yeast RNA control (lane 2) shows that in the absence of added RNase, the probe was intact. The figure also shows the effect of altering the amount of RNase A/RNase T1 mixture used to digest unhybridized probe in reactions containing 10 µg of total mouse liver RNA. Amounts of RNase A/RNase T1 mixture used to digest unhybridized probe in each reaction were as follows, relative to the standard amount of 5 µg/ml RNase A/100 U/ml RNase T1: lane 10, 0.001×; lane 11, 0.01×; lane 12, 0.1×; lane 13, 1×; lane 14, 3×; lane 15, 10×; lane 16, 33×. Note the wide range of effective RNase concentrations for this probe‐target combination. Although the optimal RNase A/RNase T1 concentration to use in an RNase protection assay may vary for different probes, it will usually fall within the range from 0.1× to 2× the standard amount. RNase I, a single‐strand‐specific RNase isolated from E. coli , is sometimes used for RNase protection assays; however the effective dynamic range is not as wide as for RNase A/RNase T1. Use of RNase I generally requires that enzyme concentration be optimized separately for different amounts of total RNA used in the hybridization reaction. View Image -
Figure 5.1.3 Synthesis of single‐stranded (ss) DNA probes by primer extension. (A ) Primer extension from DNA sequences cloned into pT7/T3. The plasmid is first linearized with a restriction enzyme at the opposite end of the insert from that used for priming. A specific primer oligonucleotide (at the 5′ side of the insert) designed to hybridize to a specific sequence in the plasmid is added, then the DNA is heat denatured. The reaction is snap frozen, thawed, and put on ice, then incubated with a master mix containing salts, dNTPs, radiolabel, and Klenow fragment. The resulting ssDNA probe is then gel‐purified. (B ) Primer extension from double‐stranded PCR products. A specific nested primer oligonucleotide designed to hybridize to a specific sequence on the PCR product is added, then the resulting ssDNA probe is generated and purified as described above. View Image -
Figure 5.1.4 Single‐stranded DNA probes prior to gel purification. (A ) A 340‐base antisense probe synthesized with Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase by primer extension from a plasmid template using the Prime‐A‐Probe kit (Ambion). (B ) The same probe synthesized by primer extension in a thermal cycler using thermostable polymerase. (C ) A 25‐base oligonucleotide probe end‐labeled with polynucleotide kinase using the Kinase Max kit (Ambion). View Image -
Figure 5.1.5 5′ end mapping of mRNA transcription start sites. View Image -
Figure 5.1.6 Multiprobe time‐course RNase protection assay using three probes. Probes for mdr1b and mdr2 (genes involved in multiple drug resistance during chemotherapy in cancer treatment) were designed to span the regions of highest variability between the two target mRNAs. These genes are difficult to distinguish on northern blots because of their similar size and 72% homology. The regions chosen for the mdr probes contained numerous sites of multiple‐base mismatch (three or more bases) with each other, to assure that the probes were specific for the intended targets (i.e., multiple‐base mismatches are cleaved efficiently by RNase A). The probe for the constitutively expressed glyceraldehyde‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) gene was included as an internal standard to normalize the amount of total RNA used in each sample. Lanes 2 through 6 show a time course (½, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days) for induction of mdr1b and mdr2 by experimental treatment with carbon tetrachloride in rat total‐liver RNA; lane 1 shows the probes hybridized to 10 µg normal (i.e., untreated with carbon tetrachloride) rat liver. Note the variable time course for the expression of the two mdr genes. Data obtained using the RPA II kit (Ambion); reproduced from Brown et al., (National Cancer Institute, NIH). View Image -
Figure 5.1.7 Typical S1 nuclease protection assay using a single‐stranded antisense DNA probe for mouse β‐actin. Target RNA consists of decreasing amounts of mouse‐liver total RNA (10 µg, 5 µg, 2.5 µg, and 0.5 µg; lanes 4 through 8). Note the linear increase in intensity of the protected fragment with increasing sample RNA and the downward size shift of the full‐length probe at ∼340 bases to the protected fragment at 250 bases. The size shift is due to digestion of the region of the probe that contains nonhomologous vector sequences from the primer‐extension reaction. Lanes 2 and 3 contain probe plus 10 µg yeast RNA, treated with S1 nuclease (lane 3), or mock‐digested (lane 2). View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
Literature Cited | |
Benkusky, N.A., Fergus, D.J., Zucchero, T.M., and England, S.K. 2000. Regulation of the Ca2+‐sensitive domains of the maxi‐K channel in the mouse myometrium during gestation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:27712‐27719. | |
Berk, A.J. and Sharp, P.A. 1977. Sizing and mapping of early adenovirus mRNAs by gel electrophoresis of S1 endonuclease‐digested hybrids. Cell 12:721‐732. | |
Brown, P.C., Thorgeirsson, S.S., and Silverman, J.A. 1993. Cloning and regulation of the rat mdr2 gene. Nucl. Acids Res. 21:3885‐3891. | |
Burczynski, M.E., Lin, H.K., and Penning, T.M. 1999. Isoform‐specific induction of a human aldo‐keto reductase by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), electrophiles, and oxidative stress: Implications for the alternative pathway of PAH activation catalyzed by human dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Cancer Res. 59:607‐614. | |
Burton, E.A., Tinsley, J.M., Holzfeind, P.J., Rodrigues, N.R., and Davies, K.E. 1999. A second promoter provides an alternative target for therapeutic up‐regulation of utrophin in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:14025‐14030. | |
Chomczynski, P. 1992. Solubilization in formamide protects RNA from degradation. Nucl. Acids Res. 20:3791. | |
Lee, J.J. and Costlow, N.A. 1987. A molecular titration assay to measure transcript prevalence levels. Methods Enzymol. 152:633‐648. | |
Melton, D.A., Krieg, P.A., Rebagliati, M.R., Maniatis, T., Zinn, K., and Green, M.R. 1984. Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucl. Acids Res. 12:7035‐7056. | |
Myers, R.M., Larin, Z., and Maniatis, T. 1985. Detection of single‐base substitutions by ribonuclease cleavage at mismatches in RNA:DNA duplexes. Science 230:1242‐1246. | |
Schenborn, E.T. and Mierendorf, R.C. 1985. A novel transcription property of SP6 and T7 RNA polymerases: Dependence on template structure. Nucl. Acids Res. 13:6223‐6236. | |
Tran, P., Leclerc, D., Chan, M., Pai, A., Hiou‐Tim, F., Wu, Q., Goyette, P., Artigas, C., Milos, R., and Rozen, R. 2002. Multiple transcription start sites and alternative splicing in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene result in two enzyme isoforms. Mamm. Genome 13:483‐492. | |
Turnbow, M.A. and Garner, C.W. 1993. Ribonuclease protection assay: Use of biotinylated probes for the detection of two messenger RNAs. BioTechniques 15:267‐270. | |
Wundrack, I. and Dooley, S. 1992. Nonradioactive ribonuclease protection analysis using digoxygenin labeling and chemiluminescent detection. Electrophoresis 13:637‐638. |