Methylation‐Sensitive Single‐Molecule Analysis of Chromatin Structure
互联网
1079
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
Methylation?sensitive single?molecule analysis of chromatin structure is a high?resolution method for studying nucleosome positioning. As described in this unit, this method allows for the analysis of the chromatin structure of unmethylated CpG islands or in vitro?remodeled nucleosomes by treatment with the CpG?specific DNA methyltransferase SssI (M.SssI), followed by bisulfite sequencing of individual progeny DNA molecules. Unlike nuclease?based approaches, this method allows each molecule to be viewed as an individual entity instead of an average population. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 89:21.17.1?21.17.16. © 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: chromatin remodeling; nucleosome positioning; methylation footprint
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryTable of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: Treatment of Nuclei with M.SssI
- Basic Protocol 2: Single Molecule Methylation‐Based Analysis of Nucleosomal DNA Accessibility Alterations Catalyzed by Chromatin‐Remodeling Proteins In Vitro
- Basic Protocol 3: Bisulfite Conversion of Unmethylated Cytosine Residues to Thymidine
- Alternate Protocol 1: Rapid Bisulfite Conversion
- Basic Protocol 4: PCR and Cloning to Obtain Single‐Molecule Resolution of Promoter Architecture
- Reagents and Solutions
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryMaterials
Basic Protocol 1: Treatment of Nuclei with M.SssI
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Single Molecule Methylation‐Based Analysis of Nucleosomal DNA Accessibility Alterations Catalyzed by Chromatin‐Remodeling Proteins In Vitro
Materials
Basic Protocol 3: Bisulfite Conversion of Unmethylated Cytosine Residues to Thymidine
Materials
Alternate Protocol 1: Rapid Bisulfite Conversion
Materials
Basic Protocol 4: PCR and Cloning to Obtain Single‐Molecule Resolution of Promoter Architecture
Materials
|
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryFigures
-
Figure 21.17.1 Schematic of M.SssI footprinting. First chromatin is treated with M.SssI. This enzyme methylates all CpG sites in purified DNA, but it cannot methylate the same sites when they are assembled into nucleosomes or are associated with tight‐binding factors. Next, the DNA is purified, the sequences are bisulfite‐converted, and individual molecules are cloned. Patches that are inaccessible to M.SssI are revealed. Red circles indicate CpG sites that are methylated and white circles indicate sites that are unmethylated. View Image -
Figure 21.17.2 Schematic of the protocols in this unit. The procedure can start with , which describes nuclei purification and treatment of nuclei with M.SssI, or with , which discusses in vitro remodeling and treatment of the remodeled products with M.SssI. These two protocols are then followed by bisulfite conversion ( or the or commercially available kits) and PCR amplification and cloning of individual molecules (). View Image -
Figure 21.17.3 Images of cells before (A ) and after (B ) lysis of the cell membrane. (A) Microscopic image of cells prior to lysis of the cell membrane show round phase bright cells. (B) Microscopic image of cells after lysis of the cell membrane by incubation with NP‐40. After lysis, no phase bright cell membranes are apparent and nuclei are smaller with irregular outlines. View Image -
Figure 21.17.4 Schematic for the bisulfite conversion of DNA. During bisulfite treatment of DNA all unmethylated cytosines (C) are converted into uracils (U). All methylated cytosines remain unchanged. After the first PCR amplification cycle the Us are complemented with As (adenine) in the antisense strand and the methylated Cs are complemented with Gs (guanine). Then, after subsequent rounds of PCR, the Us in the sense strand become Ts (thymidine) and the methylated Cs in the sense strand remain Cs. Therefore, at the end of the whole process, unmethylated Cs become Ts and methylated Cs remain Cs. View Image -
Figure 21.17.5 Primer design for amplification of bisulfate‐converted DNA. First, convert all Cs that are not part of a CpG site to Ts in the genomic sequence. Then, design a forward primer that is complementary to the antisense strand. This primer should not contain any CpGs and should end in a converted C, if possible. The primer should be 18 to 30 bp and have a melting temperature above 50°C. Do the same for the reverse primer, but have it complement the sense strand. CpG sites are marked in red and primer is marked in blue. View Image -
Figure 21.17.6 Methylation of mononucleosomes with increasing amounts of M.SssI. Open circles represent CpG sites that were inaccessible to M.SssI and closed circles indicate CpG sites that were methylated by M.SssI. If too little M.SssI is used or if incubation times are too short, intermittent methylation patterns will be seen, as well as protection patterns which are >150‐bp per nucleosome (panels A and B ). If the experiment works correctly, then a protection pattern of 150 bp per nucleosome will be observed as patches of open CpG sites (panel C ). View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
| Appanah, R., Dickerson, D.R., Goyal, P., Groudine, M., and Lorincz, M.C. 2007. An unmethylated 3′ promoter‐proximal region is required for efficient transcription initiation. PLoS Genet. 3:e27. | |
| Bock, C., Reither, S., Mikeska, T., Paulsen, M., Walter, J., and Lengauer, T. 2005. BiQ Analyzer: Visualization and quality control for DNA methylation data from bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics 21:4067‐4068. | |
| Boeger, H., Griesenbeck, J., Strattan, J.S., and Kornberg, R.D. 2003. Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter. Mol. Cell 11:1587‐1598. | |
| Boeger, H., Griesenbeck, J., Strattan, J.S., and Kornberg, R.D. 2004. Removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding in vivo. Mol. Cell 14:667‐673. | |
| Bouazoune, K., Miranda, T.B., Jones, P.A., and Kingston, R.E. 2009. Analysis of individual remodeled nucleosomes reveals decreased histone‐DNA contacts created by hSWI/SNF. Nucleic Acids Res. (In press). | |
| Fatemi, M., Pao, M.M., Jeong, S., Gal‐Yam, E.N., Egger, G., Weisenberger, D.J., and Jones, P.A. 2005. Footprinting of mammalian promoters: Use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e176. | |
| Gal‐Yam, E.N., Jeong, S., Tanay, A., Egger, G., Lee, A.S., and Jones, P.A. 2006. Constitutive nucleosome depletion and ordered factor assembly at the GRP78 promoter revealed by single molecule footprinting. PLoS Genet. 2:e160. | |
| Gonzalgo, M.L. and Jones, P.A. 1997. Rapid quantitation of methylation differences at specific sites using methylation‐sensitive single nucleotide primer extension (Ms‐SNuPE). Nucleic Acids Res. 25:2529‐2531. | |
| Gonzalgo, M.L. and Liang, G. 2007. Methylation‐sensitive single‐nucleotide primer extension (Ms‐SNuPE) for quantitative measurement of DNA methylation. Nat. Protoc. 2:1931‐1936. | |
| Hinshelwood, R.A., Melki, J.R., Huschtscha, L.I., Paul, C., Song, J.Z., Stirzaker, C., Reddel, R.R., and Clark, S.J. 2009. Aberrant de novo methylation of the p16INK4A CpG island is initiated post gene silencing in association with chromatin remodeling and mimics nucleosome positioning. Hum. Mol. Genet. (In press). | |
| Kladde, M.P. and Simpson, R.T. 1994. Positioned nucleosomes inhibit Dam methylation in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91:1361‐1365. | |
| Kladde, M.P. and Simpson, R.T. 1996. Chromatin structure mapping in vivo using methyltransferases. Methods Enzymol. 274:214‐233. | |
| Kladde, M.P., Xu, M., and Simpson, R.T. 1996. Direct study of DNA‐protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells. Embo J. 15:6290‐6300. | |
| Lin, J.C., Jeong, S., Liang, G., Takai, D., Fatemi, M., Tsai, Y.C., Egger, G., Gal‐Yam, E.N., and Jones, P.A. 2007. Role of nucleosomal occupancy in the epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 CpG island. Cancer Cell 12:432‐444. | |
| Lomvardas, S. and Thanos, D. 2001. Nucleosome sliding via TBP DNA binding in vivo. Cell 106:685‐696. | |
| Lorch, Y., LaPointe, J.W. and Kornberg, R.D. 1987. Nucleosomes inhibit the initiation of transcription but allow chain elongation with the displacement of histones. Cell 49:203‐210. | |
| Lusser, A. and Kadonaga, J.T. 2003. Chromatin remodeling by ATP‐dependent molecular machines. Bioessays 25:1192‐1200. | |
| Rando, O.J. and Chang, H.Y. 2009. Genome‐wide views of chromatin structure. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:245‐271. | |
| Renbaum, P., Abrahamove, D., Fainsod, A., Wilson, G.G., Rottem, S., and Razin, A. 1990. Cloning, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of the gene coding for the CpG DNA methylase from Spiroplasma sp. strain MQ1(M.SssI). Nucleic Acids Res. 18:1145‐1152. | |
| Shiraishi, M. and Hayatsu, H. 2004. High‐speed conversion of cytosine to uracil in bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis of DNA methylation. DNA Res. 11:409‐415. | |
| Studitsky, V.M., Clark, D.J., and Felsenfeld, G. 1995. Overcoming a nucleosomal barrier to transcription. Cell 83:19‐27. | |
| Studitsky, V.M., Walter, W., Kireeva, M., Kashlev, M., and Felsenfeld, G. 2004. Chromatin remodeling by RNA polymerases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29:127‐135. | |
| Tost, J., Dunker, J., and Gut, I.G. 2003. Analysis and quantification of multiple methylation variable positions in CpG islands by Pyrosequencing. Biotechniques 35:152‐156. | |
| Tsukiyama, T., Becker, P.B. and Wu, C. 1994. ATP‐dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat‐shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367:525‐532. | |
| Wang, R.Y., Gehrke, C.W., and Ehrlich, M. 1980. Comparison of bisulfite modification of 5‐methyldeoxycytidine and deoxycytidine residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 8:4777‐4790. | |
| Workman, J.L. and Kingston, R.E. 1998. Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:545‐579. | |
| Wu, C. and Allis, C.D. 2004. Chromatin and Chromatin Remodeling Enzymes, Part C (Methods in Enzymology). Academic Press, San Diego. | |
| Xu, Y.H., Manoharan, H.T. and Pitot, H.C. 2007. CpG PatternFinder: A Windows‐based utility program for easy and rapid identification of the CpG methylation status of DNA. Biotechniques 43:334‐342. | |
| Internet Resources | |
| http://biq‐analyzer.bioinf.mpi‐sb.mpg.de/ | |
| This program aligns bisulfite‐converted sequences and removes poorly converted and duplicate sequences. |
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
