Animal Models of Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder
互联网
1317
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
Animal behavioral studies have commonly regarded the entire group of animals subjected to the study conditions as homogeneous, disregarding individual differences in response patterns. The following discussion will focus on a method of analyzing data that aims to model clinical diagnostic criteria applied to individual patterns of response using data from behavioral measures, and employing cut?off scores to distinguish between extremes of response versus non?response and the sizeable proportion of study subjects in?between them. This protocol unit will present the concept of the model and its background, provide detailed protocols for each of its components, and present a selection of studies employing and examining the model, alongside the underlying translational rationale of each. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 64:9.45.1?9.45.18. © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: post?traumatic stress disorder; animal model; cut?off behavioral criteria; anxiety; resilience; vulnerability; elevated plus?maze; acoustic startle response; freezing
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryTable of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: The Predator‐Scent Stress (PSS) Paradigm
- Basic Protocol 2: Assessment of Overall Exploratory Behavior Using the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) and Quantification of Hyper‐Alertness Using the Acoustic Startle Response (ASR)
- Basic Protocol 3: Classification According to Cut‐Off Behavioral Criteria (CBC)
- Basic Protocol 4: Exposure to Trauma Cues
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryMaterials
Basic Protocol 1: The Predator‐Scent Stress (PSS) Paradigm
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Assessment of Overall Exploratory Behavior Using the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) and Quantification of Hyper‐Alertness Using the Acoustic Startle Response (ASR)
Materials
Basic Protocol 3: Classification According to Cut‐Off Behavioral Criteria (CBC)
Materials
Basic Protocol 4: Exposure to Trauma Cues
Materials
|
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online LibraryFigures
-
Figure 9.45.1 Predator scent stress (PSS) test apparatus. The apparatus consists of a 40 × 40 × 40–cm chamber of transparent Plexiglas with transparent roof. The floor is covered with a 5‐ to 6‐cm layer of well soiled cat litter (in use by the cat for 2 days, sifted for stools). The apparatus is placed on a yard paving stone. View Image -
Figure 9.45.2 The elevated plus‐maze apparatus. The maze is made of black Plexiglas, consists of four arms in form of a maze: two open arms (for rats: 50 × 10 cm; for mice: 30 × 6 cm) and two arms of the same size, that are enclosed by walls (for rats: 40 cm high; for mice: 30 cm). The open arms are opposite each other and converge into a central platform (for rats: 10 × 10 cm; for mice: 6 × 6 cm). A video camera mounted above the maze is used to observe the animal's behavior and record the trails for automatic computer analysis, for later additional scoring or both. View Image -
Figure 9.45.3 The acoustic startle response apparatus. (A ) The cabinet contains a complete sound generation system for white noise production, separately adjustable background noise levels, and accessory connections for optional stimuli. The audio source module is used to provide acoustic stimuli. For tone stimuli (B ), amplitude, frequency, and duration are computer controlled. Amplitude and duration of noise bursts are computer controlled. Specialized amplifier circuitry, contained in the cabinet, permits the use of a dynamic standardization system that emulates actual startle response movements. The dynamic response sensor design ignores static animal weights enabling the full range of the transducer capacity to be available for response recording. (D ) Animal enclosures are designed to locate the subject without using restraint so the animals do not suffer from restraint stress and confound the results of the startle testing. View Image -
Figure 9.45.4 The cut‐off behavioral criteria (CBC) algorithm. Behavioral models can be more closely matched with contemporary clinical conceptions of PTSD by using an approach that enables the classification of study animals into groups according to degree of response to the stressor, i.e., the degree to which individual behavior is altered or disrupted. This was achieved by defining both the behavioral criteria and the cut‐off criteria that reflect response severity, a design that parallels the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in clinical research. (A ) The data must demonstrate that the stressor had a significant effect on the overall behavior of exposed versus non‐exposed populations at the time of assessment. (B ) To maximize the resolution and minimize false positives, extreme responses to both of these paradigms performed in sequence are required for “inclusion” in the EBR group, whereas a negligible degree of response to both is required for inclusion in the MBR group. View Image -
Figure 9.45.5 The effect of the predator scent stress (PSS) paradigm on overall anxiety‐like behavior and acoustic startle response. A single ten‐minute exposure to PSS significantly increased anxiety‐like behavior/avoidance of open spaces as compared to unexposed controls. Time spent in the open arms (A ) and entries into open arms (B ) were significantly decreased after a single exposure to the stressor, as compared to control conditions [F(1,298) = 126.4, p < 0.0001 and F(1,298) = 68.25, p < 0.0001, respectively]. There were no differences in total exploration (C ) of the maze between groups. This result suggests overall anxiety and avoidance of exploration in the open arms, as opposed to an impairment of locomotion/exploration. PSS exposure significantly increased the mean startle amplitude (D ) and caused a significant deficit in the startle habituation of ASR (E ) in exposed rats as compared to controls [F(1,298) = 51.04, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 298) = 45.25, p < 0.0001, respectively]. All data represent group mean ± S.E.M. View Image -
Figure 9.45.6 The distributions of the exposed groups and the control group. The distributions of the exposed groups and the control group (time spent in the closed arms, startle response and startle habituation) were compared by a Kolmogorov‐Smirnov statistic. The results showed that there are differences in the general shapes of the distributions curve in the two populations ( p < 0.001). The distribution curve for exposed animals has a distinct shifts (in the parameter of time spent in the open arms: shift to the left; startle response: a discontinuous nature, tending towards a bimodal distribution; Startle habituation: shift to the left). View Image -
Figure 9.45.7 The effect of the predator scent stress (PSS) paradigm on anxiety‐like behavior and acoustic startle response. The figures represent time spent in the open arms (A ,B ) of the elevated plus maze and in the mean acoustic startle amplitude (C ,D ) in rats exposed to a cat‐scent, as compared to controls. Exposed rats spent less time in the open arms (center) and exhibited higher mean startle amplitude (circumference) as compared to controls. Overall, a wide distribution in results was observed within the exposed rats with a broad range of variation in behavioral response. We thus hypothesized that the group is not homogeneous, and we may be dealing with several subgroups in this population. Based on the results of this phase of the study the animals were subdivided into groups reflecting magnitude of response according to the CBC's, focusing selectively on EBR, PBR, and MBR. In E , representation of the data from both the elevated plus maze (EPM) and ASR paradigms reveals two distinct features. First, PSS exposure alters the response of the majority of individuals to at least some degree. Second, the cluster of individuals that forms in the upper left hand corner of the graph (i.e., more extreme responses to exposure) is distinct from the majority of individuals. View Image -
Figure 9.45.8 Relative prevalence rates according to CBCs. Re‐analysis of data applying Cut‐off Behavioral Criteria: (A ) Prevalence of extreme behavioral response (EBR) rats. (B ) Prevalence of minimal behavioral response (MBR) rats. (C ) Prevalence of partial behavioral response (PBR) rats. There were significant differences in the prevalence rates of individuals displaying EBR among groups (Pearson χ2 = 296.11, df = 3, p < 0.0001). PSS exposure increased the prevalence of PTSD‐like behavioral responses (EBR) ( x 2 = 29.85, p < 0.0001) and concomitantly reduced prevalence rates of minimal behavioral response (MBR) (x2 = 11.54, p < 0.0008), relative to unexposed controls. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
| Literature Cited | |
| Adamec, R. 1997. Transmitter systems involved in neural plasticity underlying increased anxiety and defense—Implications for understanding anxiety following traumatic stress. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21:755‐765. | |
| Adamec, R.E. and Shallow, T. 1993. Lasting effects on rodent anxiety of a single exposure to a cat. Physiol. Behav. 54:101‐109. | |
| Adamec, R., Head, D., Blundell, J., Burton, P., and Berton, O. 2006a. Lasting anxiogenic effects of feline predator stress in mice: Sex differences in vulnerability to stress and predicting severity of anxiogenic response from the stress experience. Physiol. Behav. 88:12‐29. | |
| Adamec, R., Strasser, K., Blundell, J., Burton, P., and McKay, D.W. 2006b. Protein synthesis and the mechanisms of lasting change in anxiety induced by severe stress. Behav. Brain Res. 167:270‐286. | |
| Adamec, R.E., Blundell, J., and Burton, P. 2006c. Relationship of the predatory attack experience to neural plasticity, pCREB expression and neuroendocrine response. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30:356‐375. | |
| Adamec, R., Muir, C., Grimes, M., and Pearcey, K. 2007. Involvement of noradrenergic and corticoid receptors in the consolidation of the lasting anxiogenic effects of predator stress. Behav. Brain Res. 179:192‐207. | |
| American Psychiatric Association 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C. | |
| B'aszczyk, J.W. 2003. Startle response to short acoustic stimuli in rats. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 63:25‐30. | |
| Blanchard, R.J., Blanchard, D.C., Rodgers, J., and Weiss, S.M. 1990. The characterization and modelling of antipredator defensive behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 14:463‐472. | |
| Blanchard, R.J., Griebel, G., Henrie, J.A., and Blanchard, D.C. 1997. Differentiation of anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs by effects on rat and mouse defense test batteries. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21:783‐789. | |
| Blanchard, R.J., Nikulina, J.N., Sakai, R.R., McKittrick, C., McEwen, B., and Blanchard, D.C. 1998. Behavioral and endocrine change following chronic predatory stress. Physiol. Behav. 63:561‐569. | |
| Blanchard, R.J., Yang, M., Li, C.I., Gervacio, A., and Blanchard, D.C. 2001. Cue and context conditioning of defensive behaviors to cat odor stimuli. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:587‐595. | |
| Blanchard, D.C., Griebel, G., and Blanchard, R.J. 2003. Conditioning and residual emotionality effects of predator stimuli: Some reflections on stress and emotion. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 27:1177‐1185. | |
| Breslau, N., Davis, G.C., Andreski, P., and Peterson, E. 1991. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 48:216‐222. | |
| Breslau, N., Kessler, R.C., Chilcoat, H.D., Schultz, L.R., Davis, G.C., and Andreski, P. 1998. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: The 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 55:626‐632. | |
| Bryant, R.A. 2006. Recovery after the tsunami: timeline for rehabilitation. J. Clin. Psychiatry 67:50‐55. | |
| Cohen, H. and Zohar, J. 2004. Animal models of post‐traumatic stress disorder: The use of cut off behavioral criteria. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1032:167‐178. | |
| Cohen, H., Zohar, J., Matar, M.A., Zeev, K., Loewenthal, U., and Richter‐Levin, G. 2004. Setting apart the affected: The use of behavioral criteria in animal models of post‐traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1962‐1970. | |
| Cohen, H., Kaplan, Z., Matar, M., Loewenthal, U., Kozlovsky, N., and Zohar, J. 2006a. Anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor, disrupts traumatic memory consolidation and attenuates post‐traumatic stress response in rats. Biol. Psychiatry 60:767‐776. | |
| Cohen, H., Matar, M., Richter‐Levin, G., and Zohar, J. 2006b. The contribution of an animal model towards uncovering biological risk factors for PTSD. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1071:335‐350. | |
| Cohen, H., Matar, M., Buskila, D., Kaplan, Z., and Zohar, J. 2008. Early post‐stressor intervention with high dose corticosterone attenuates post‐traumatic stress response in an animal model of PTSD. Biol. Psychiatry 64:708‐717. | |
| Cohen, H., Kozlovsky, N., Matar, M.A., Kaplan, Z., and Zohar, J. 2010. Mapping the brain pathways of traumatic memory: Inactivation of protein kinase M zeta in different brain regions disrupts traumatic memory processes and attenuates traumatic stress responses in rats. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 20:253‐271. | |
| Davidson, J.R. 2006. Pharmacologic treatment of acute and chronic stress following trauma. J Clin. Psychiatry 67:S34‐S39. | |
| Diamond, D.M., Campbell, A.M., Park, C.R., Woodson, J.C., Conrad, C.D., Bachstetter, A.D., and Mervis, R.F. 2006. Influence of predator stress on the consolidation versus retrieval of long‐term spatial memory and hippocampal spinogenesis. Hippocampus 16:571‐576. | |
| Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., and Simons, R.C. 1985. Is the startle reaction an emotion? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49:1416‐1426. | |
| Fairbank, J.A., Schlenger, W.E., Saigh, P.A., and Davidson, J.R.T. 1995. An epidemiologic profile of post‐traumatic stress disorder: Prevalence, comorbidity, and risk factors. In Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress: From Normal Adaptation to PTSD (M.J. Friedman, D.S. Charney, and A.Y. Deutch, eds.) pp. 415‐427. Lippincott‐Raven, Philadelphia. | |
| File, S.E., Zangrossi, H. Jr., Sanders, F.L., and Mabbutt, P.S. 1993. Dissociation between behavioral and corticosterone responses on repeated exposures to cat odor. Physiol. Behav. 54:1109‐1111. | |
| Foa, E.B., Stein, D.J., and McFarlane, A.C. 2006. Symptomatology and psychopathology of mental health problems after disaster. J. Clin. Psychiatry 67:15‐25. | |
| Graham, F.K. 1979. Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. In The Orienting Reflex in Humans (H.D. Kimmel EHvOaJFO, ed.) pp 137‐167. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, N.J. | |
| Griebel, G., Blanchard, D.C., Jung, A., Lee, J.C., Masuda, C.K., and Blanchard, R.J. 1995. Further evidence that the mouse defense test battery is useful for screening anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs: Effects of acute and chronic treatment with alprazolam. Neuropharmacology 34:1625‐1633. | |
| Helzer, J., Robins, L., and McEvoy, L. 1987. Post‐traumatic stress disorder in the general population. Findings of the epidemiologic catchment area survey. N. Engl. J. Med. 317:1630‐1634. | |
| Kozlovsky, N., Matar, M.A., Kaplan, Z., Zohar, J., and Cohen, H. 2009. The role of the galaninergic system in modulating stress‐related responses in an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 65:383‐391. | |
| Landis, C. and Hunt, W. 1939. The Startle Pattern. Farrar & Rinehart, Oxford, U.K. | |
| Nutt, D. and Davidson, J. 2000. Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder Diagnosis, Management and Treatment. Taylor & Francis, London. | |
| Pellow, S. and File, S.E. 1986. Anxiolytic and anxiogenic drug effects on exploratory activity in an elevated plus‐maze: A novel test of anxiety in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 24:525‐529. | |
| Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S.E., and Briley, M. 1985. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus‐maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 14:149‐167. | |
| Peri, T., Ben‐Shakhar, G., Orr, S.P., and Shalev, A.Y. 2000. Psychophysiologic assessment of aversive conditioning in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 47:512‐519. | |
| Resnick, H., Yehuda, R., Pitman, R., and Foy, D. 1995. Effect of previous trauma on acute plasma cortisol level following rape. Am. J. Psychiatry 152:1675‐1677. | |
| Shalev, A.Y. 2002. Acute stress reactions in adults. Biol. Psychiatry 51:532‐543. | |
| Shore, J., Vollmer, W., and Tatum, E. 1989. Community patterns of posttraumatic stress disorders. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 177:681‐685. |
GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
